|


| |
Outcomes
The outcomes and
traits below articulate the goals of the course and the expectations for the
final portfolio. In each sequence, the shorter writings target some of the
traits, and the larger essay includes most traits. Your portfolio needs to show
you have revised for every trait.
1. To demonstrate an awareness of the
strategies that writers use in different writing contexts.
-
The writing employs style, tone,
and conventions appropriate to the demands of a particular genre and
situation.
-
· The writer is able to demonstrate
the ability to write for different audiences and contexts, both within and
outside the university classroom.
-
· The writing has a clear
understanding of its audience, and various aspects of the writing (mode of
inquiry, content, structure, appeals, tone, sentences, and word choice)
address and are strategically pitched to that audience.
-
· The writer articulates and
assesses the effects of his or her writing choices.
2. To read, analyze, and synthesize
complex texts and incorporate multiple kinds of evidence purposefully in order
to generate and support writing.
-
· The writing demonstrates an
understanding of the course texts as necessary for the purpose at hand.
-
· Course texts are used in
strategic, focused ways (for example: summarized, cited, applied,
challenged, recontextualized) to support the goals of the writing.
-
· The writing is intertextual,
meaning that a “conversation” between texts and ideas is created in support
of the writer’s goals.
-
· The writer is able to utilize
multiple kinds of evidence gathered from various sources (primary and
secondary – for example, library research, interviews, questionnaires,
observations, cultural artifacts) in order to support writing goals.
-
· The writing demonstrates
responsible use of the MLA (or other appropriate) system of documenting
sources.
3. To produce complex, analytic,
persuasive arguments that matter in academic contexts.
-
· The argument is appropriately
complex, based in a claim that emerges from and explores a line of inquiry.
-
· The stakes of the argument, why
what is being argued matters, are articulated and persuasive.
-
· The argument involves analysis,
which is the close scrutiny and examination of evidence and assumptions in
support of a larger set of ideas.
-
· The argument is persuasive,
taking into consideration counterclaims and multiple points of view as it
generates its own perspective and position.
-
· The argument utilizes a clear
organizational strategy and effective transitions that develop its line of
inquiry.
4. To develop flexible strategies for
revising, editing, and proofreading writing.
-
· The writing demonstrates
substantial and successful revision.
-
· The writing responds to
substantive issues raised by the instructor and peers.
-
· Errors of grammar, punctuation,
and mechanics are proofread and edited so as not to interfere with reading
and understanding the writing.
|